New Film on Dr. Burzynski Cancer Treatment Free This Weekend Online

Salem-News.com Top Stories

Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

M. Dennis Paul, Ph.D. June 10, 2011 11:21 pm (Pacific time)

Having been one of the earliest supporters of Dr. Burzynski's work as well as the work of Jonathan Wright and a host of other genuine researchers (all having suffered assaults at the hands of the very illegitimate cancer industry, I can attest to the genius of this individual. Many are not aware of the vicious assault against him back in 1985 when his office was raided by the FDA who stole over 200,000 patient records, files, notes, etc in their attempt to permanently close his Institute. Among those involved in the persistent harassment of Stanislaw were the FDA, AMA, NIH, Texas Board of Medical Examiners, the Harris County Medical Society and a host of insurance companies such as Aetna.

Murray E.G. Smith's definitive evaluation of the controversy surrounding Stanislaw, published in the Canadian Journal of Sociology, states that "The fundamental point is that the whole controversy served to expose a curious conservatism within the cancer establishment and a disturbing blindness to anything but the most narrow considerations of proper procedure and conduct... The existing "cancer industry" (a complex ensemble of clinicians, drug companies, researchers and institutes) is very well established and has a compelling economic interest in perpetuating itself" (Moss 1991.). It should come as no surprise that it these very same players who have worked tirelessly to cover up the inadequacies and outright deceptions of the AIDS hypothesis and resulting controversy and who caused tremendous hardship on those researchers who questioned the HIV/AIDS hypothesis. What is unknown to so many is that these researchers in the "cancer industry" were all heavily invested in the viral cause of cancer. After decades of producing nothing in terms of evidence in support of their work, the CDC and NIH were preparing to defund many of their labs. This was occurring in the early 1980's. Suddenly, a new "disease" was "discovered" (HIV/AIDS) and the labs, having already been long set up to support the virologists who had been running cancer research, were given a fresh infusion of capital to research this new "virally induced disease". The pharmaceutical companies who had been hard at work creating a wide variety of highly toxic "anti-viral" medications also experienced a massive resurgence in funding.

Can anybody smell the coffee?

Stanislaw, like many of my other friends, was not a team player supporting the failed virologists and fabricating massive amounts of meaningless drivel. Like my other friends, he was a maverick who determined to actually look at what was there to be viewed.. not imaginary viruses so, small, so delicate, and so undetectable. In Stanislaw's case, unlike that of the virologists, his work was properly conducted so as to be reproducible with the same effects being demonstrated in case after case after case. This represented, and still does, a monumental threat to the economic lifeblood of the non-productive "cancer industry". (BTW... one of the first "viruses" purported to cause cancer was the so-called "HIV". Funny how when it was soundly disproved, "HIV" was kept alive as the cause of "AIDS".)

[Return to Top]