Saturday January 11, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Jan-21-2007 19:00printcomments

Op-Ed: Circumventing Oregon's Constitution For an Emergency Experiment

By: The 11 members of the House of Representatives who voted “no” on SCR 1 on January 17th.

Oregon State Capitol building
Salem-News.com

(SALEM) - 150 years ago a group of 60 elected delegates met in Salem and drafted Oregon’s Constitution in just 33 days.

They sent it to the ballot where it was approved by voters.

Recently a majority of Oregon’s modern day delegates voted to circumvent the spirit and intent of our state constitution by adopting Senate Concurrent Resolution 1, the “Annual Sessions test.”

Article IV, Section 10 of the Oregon Constitution specifically states legislative sessions “shall be held biennially” - every two years.

Only the people can change the Constitution if they believe the Legislature should convene at the State Capitol every year. Lawmakers should not usurp Oregonians’ constitutional right to vote on this important issue.

The Constitution allows the legislature to call a special session “in the event of an emergency”.

SCR 1, approved by the both the Oregon House and Senate, declares an artificial emergency so we can conduct an experiment with annual sessions in February 2008.

How do you schedule an emergency 13 months in advance?

There has been much talk this session about providing more public participation.

SCR 1 does just the opposite by shutting the voters out of the process. We’re sacrificing the voting rights of Oregonians so politicians can try an experiment some say is nothing more than an expansion of power.

If annual sessions are such a good idea why not send it to the ballot this spring and let the voters have the final say? That option is permitted in the State Constitution.

In addition to the constitutionality of this concept, legislators voting on SCR 1 were missing two critical pieces of information: the cost of annual sessions and a plan to measure the success.

Members of the Legislature must be able to give an honest accounting to Oregonians of the success or failure of this “test”.

Some of us might support annual sessions, but not at the expense of the Constitution or the voters’ trust.

At the beginning of the session we all raised our right hands and swore to uphold the Oregon Constitution.

That is the main reason we could not support this proposal to bypass the rights of Oregon’s citizens.

We have too much respect for the process, the institution, and the people of Oregon to move forward without a complete plan. Letting the voters decide is the right thing to do.

Sincerely,

The 11 members of the House of Representatives who voted “no” on SCR 1 on January 17th.

  • Brian Boquist State Representative District 23
  • Tom Butler State Representative District 60
  • Linda Flores State Representative District 51
  • Victor Gilliam State Representative District 18
  • Fred Girod State Representative District 17
  • Bruce Hanna State Representative District 7
  • Bob Jenson State Representative District 58
  • Greg Smith State Representative District 57
  • Kim Thatcher State Representative District 25
  • Gene Whisnant State Representative District 53
  • George Gilman State Representative District 55




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Henry Ruark January 23, 2007 10:50 am (Pacific time)

Even the Founders might well have approved simple test-run prior to Constitutional change by initiative. Test-run won majority vote by elected reps.;what's wrong with that ? Distortion/perversion by initiatives all too easy. Need I name recent disasters ?


Curmudgeon January 22, 2007 12:03 am (Pacific time)

The Constitution is very clear on the subject of how often the legislature meets. It specifically says "biennially". In the English language that means every second year, and it's my observation that the Oregon Consititution is written in English. Do we have legislators who are unable to understand simple English, or who don't understand that statute cannot preempt the Constitution? They have the authority to change WHEN the legislature meets, but changing the frequency of those sessions requires a Constitutional amendment, and approval of that amendment by a vote of the people. Are these people living in a fantasy world? It sure looks that way. Do they have ANY concept of reality? It appears not.


call me Slam January 21, 2007 7:20 pm (Pacific time)

thanks, otherwise "they" would've swept it under the tapestry in the guise of another "benefit" to the voters.

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for January 20, 2007 | Articles for January 21, 2007 | Articles for January 22, 2007

googlec507860f6901db00.html
The NAACP of the Willamette Valley

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Sean Flynn was a photojournalist in Vietnam, taken captive in 1970 in Cambodia and never seen again.

Click here for all of William's articles and letters.