Friday January 10, 2025
| |||
SNc Channels: HomeNews by DateSportsVideo ReportsWeatherBusiness NewsMilitary NewsRoad ReportCannabis NewsCommentsADVERTISEStaffCompany StoreCONTACT USRSS Subscribe Search About Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com is an Independent Online Newsgroup in the United States, setting the standard for the future of News. Publisher: Bonnie King CONTACT: Newsroom@Salem-news.com Advertising: Adsales@Salem-news.com ~Truth~ ~Justice~ ~Peace~ TJP |
Jan-15-2008 13:03TweetFollow @OregonNews Hateful Speech Won't be Tolerated on European TVSalem-News.comEuropean Parliament calls for withdrawing public funds from extremist political groups.
(STRASBURG) - The European Parliament in Strasburg today called for public funding to be withdrawn from political parties - or media businesses - that incite to hate of a group of people on the basis of their race, religion, handicap, sexual orientation or nationality. They also stressed that such speeches coming from public personalities should be considered an aggravating circumstance. The European parliament adopted a resolution to show its concern on the fact that several European countries have experienced recently hatred violent events and killings. The text, adopted by 527 votes in favor, 15 against and 39 abstentions, calls for public funding to be withdrawn from "political parties that do not condemn violence and terrorism and don't abide with human rights as set out in the Charter for Fundamental Rights" -formally signed yesterday in plenary by the three EU institutions-, and to the media who promote racist, xenophobic and homophobic ideas. The Chamber also said to be "seriously alarmed at the Islamic fundamentalist recruitment" in Europe. Members stressed that public personalities should "refrain from statements that encourage or incite to hate or stigmatisation of groups of people on the basis of their race, ethnic origin, religion, handicap, sexual orientation or nationality" and believed that being a public personality should be considered as an aggravating circumstance when inciting to hatred. Furthermore, on an amendment adopted by 450 votes in favor, 93 against and 30 abstentions, MEPs warn, looking to the 2009 European elections, "of the possibility that extremist parties may secure representation in the European Parliament and calls on the political groups to take the appropriate measures in order to ensure that a democratic institution is not used as a platform for financing and echoing anti-democratic messages". The resolution calls on the EU institutions to give a clear mandate to the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights to investigate on the structures of extremist groups, and for governments to give appropriate preventive responses," regarding young's people education and public information, teaching against totalitarianism" and keeping alive the memory of European history. Members also expressed their concern on how to counteract the existence of public and easily accessible websites which incite to hatred without violating freedom of expression. The resolution, which does not name concrete examples of extremist groups or associations in Europe, does include in such category neo-nazis, neo-fascists and all "movements, paramilitary groups and parties" which base their ideology on "racism, intolerance, incitement to religious hatred, exclusion, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-Gypsism, homophobia, misogyny and ultra-nationalism". Among the most vulnerable groups mentioned are "migrants, Roma, homosexuals, antiracist activists and homeless". Last November 29th, Parliament also adopted a consultation report to harden a future EU law to combat certain forms of racism and xenophobia, including the establishment of criminal sanctions -from one to three years of prison- to any public incitement to violence or hatred, even by dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other material. The legislative text -first European law of this kind, which still needs to be transposed by Member States-, also includes punishment for the denial or gross trivialisation of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. Source: ilga-europe.org/ Articles for January 14, 2008 | Articles for January 15, 2008 | Articles for January 16, 2008 | googlec507860f6901db00.htmlQuick Links
DININGWillamette UniversityGoudy Commons Cafe Dine on the Queen Willamette Queen Sternwheeler MUST SEE SALEMOregon Capitol ToursCapitol History Gateway Willamette River Ride Willamette Queen Sternwheeler Historic Home Tours: Deepwood Museum The Bush House Gaiety Hollow Garden AUCTIONS - APPRAISALSAuction Masters & AppraisalsCONSTRUCTION SERVICESRoofing and ContractingSheridan, Ore. ONLINE SHOPPINGSpecial Occasion DressesAdvertise with Salem-NewsContact:AdSales@Salem-News.com Support Salem-News.com: | |
Contact: adsales@salem-news.com | Copyright © 2025 Salem-News.com | news tips & press releases: newsroom@salem-news.com.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.
Neal Feldman January 16, 2008 12:12 pm (Pacific time)
This is an example of why I like the US (and Oregon) best. The free speech and expression protections as well as the protections of religious freedom. Does anyone really think that hate groups will become less hateful with such laws? Really? The answer to bad speech is more good speech, not censorship. Ah well...
Neal Feldman January 16, 2008 12:10 pm (Pacific time)
Marianne Tioran - It is a sin in certain religions, not in all. It is every bit your right to be a homophobic bigot. (at least in the US, not so much anymore in the EU apparently) - you just do not have the right to inflict it on others to their detriment via discrimination, harassment or other means. Like you say if 'done in a kind manner' you can believe whatever you like. But one person's idea of 'kind manner' may well not be that of another. (again, in the US at least) As for so called 'Christian-phobic' phobias are by definition irrational. There is nothing irrational in concern re: christian fundies and their attacks )physical or ephemeral) on those they disagree with. We need only see Fred Phelps and crew to know such fears and concerns, far from being irrational, are in fact quite reasonable and very prudent in fact. Ah well...
Henry Ruark January 16, 2008 6:47 am (Pacific time)
Marianne T,: Absolutely agree...that's what the First Amendment is all about. Just make sure any such declaration of faith is clear on that point, and in no way demeaning or attacking of any other faith. That's major point of defense here vs attack on this channel --and also of major direction this channel, and any other open, honest one, must provide to be not only effective but ethical and credible. Thank you for use of full name, too, indicating your own good faith and courage, as well as confidence in others participating here --one might call it Christian attitude at work, proudly displayed.
Marianne Tioran January 16, 2008 4:12 am (Pacific time)
Protecting people's rights is fine, but not by discrimination against other groups. Homosexuality is a sin, and there is nothing wrong by saying this. It is not an act of hatred to say this, only a statement of moral position. It is not advocating violence and hatred, but a need for God in one's life. This kind of statement should be allowed if done in a kind manner. Otherwise, you will have Christian-phobic or anti-God behavior which is usually negative and hateful. Sincere religious people need their rights respected too.
[Return to Top]©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.