Saturday January 11, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Dec-18-2009 22:32printcomments

EU: The Only Deal Available in Copenhagen

While the head of China’s climate delegation thought “everyone should be happy”, it was uncertain late Friday night whether the “Copenhagen Accord” agreed by the US, China, South Africa and India would win broader support among countries.

COP15 Climate Change Conference 2009
Photo courtesy: Copenhagen Climate Change Conference

(COPENHAGEN) - After a ”Copenhagen Accord” was agreed by the US, China, South Africa and India in Copenhagen, it was still unclear by Friday midnight which other countries were willing to support and sign it.

US President Barack Obama said the deal would be a foundation for global action but there was "much further to go". The head of China’s climate delegation Xie Zhenhua thought “everyone should be happy”, according to Reuters.

An EU spokesperson told BBC News: “What could be agreed today, falls far below our expectations but it keeps our goals and ambitions alive…It was the only deal available in Copenhagen.”

Yvo de Boer, Executive Secretary of the UN Climate Change Secretariat, said it was still to be seen how the text would be received by the broader group of countries.

“It's great that a small group of leaders gets together and tries to advance the process. But ultimately the way things work here it has to be acceptable to every country," Yvo de Boer said and continued according to Reuters:

"If this makes it through the meeting in a couple of hours' time then I see it as a modest success. We could have achieved more."

Brazil’s Climate Change Ambassador Sergio Serra called the accord “very disappointing” but not “a failure”.

Greenpeace criticized the accord for not having “targets for carbon cuts and no agreement on a legally binding treaty”. Oxfam International called the deal “a triumph of spin over substance. It recognizes the need to keep warming below two degrees but does not commit to do so. It kicks back the decisions on emissions cuts and fudges the issue of climate cash.”

The so-called Copenhagen Accord confirms the continuation of the Kyoto Protocol and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. It sets a maximum of two degrees Celsius average global temperature rise, and states that a review by 2016 should consider if it will be necessary to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

On financing, the Copenhagen Accord says developed countries commit collectively to providing 30 billion US dollars in new, additional funding for developing countries for the 2010-2012 period. It also says developed countries support “a goal of mobilizing jointly 100 billion dollars a year” by 2020 from a variety of forces.

Developed countries commit to at least 80 percent emissions reductions by 2050 in the accord. Commitments on shorter terms have to be settled later.

Supported national mitigation actions will be subject to international measurement, reporting and verification, the accord states. Mitigations actions taken by developed countries will be monitored nationally and reported every second year by guidelines adopted later by the parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Source: Copenhagen Climate Change Conference




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Henry Clay Ruark December 19, 2009 6:59 pm (Pacific time)

For those serious readers seeking solid information about climate change, see: Zero Hour For Climate Action”, a 22-page special section in The NATION, 7 Dec. 2009. Sub-titled “Copenhagen and Beyond”, this well-documented report presents seven proven-authoritative writers covering major issues, problems, portents, and probabilities in what has become perhaps the most crucial issue demanding worldwide cooperative action. It is a solid remedy for circular reasoning often demonstrated as a technique to denigrate both the issue and those reporting on it via documented materials.


Henry Clay Ruark December 19, 2009 6:38 pm (Pacific time)

Friend Al: Many working agreements are made by government agencies without Congressional approval as required for formal treaty format. Any President can take wide action without the formal treaty format being either demanded or desirable, as you should know. Re your pointing to "record cold temperatures",that surely indicates your acceptance of wide changes from usual cycle of weather...else why even mention it ? Which is one of major facts set forth in the scientific proof of extreme climate change now occurring,with its intolerable demand for action to avoid whatever we still can of desperate damage to our planet, long plundered by private interests for their dollar gains. Nothing ironic here if one will but recognize reality, often denied by those who allow themselves to be captured by circular reasoning and its fallacies.


Al Marnelli December 19, 2009 7:09 am (Pacific time)

Doesn't the congress have to approve all treaties? Also does this not require a 2/3's majority? I believe there is something that can be done on an executive level, but seems there are some obstacles in the way, so it will probably be the EPA that will jump in, then watch the lawsuits begin. Anyone notice the record cold temperatures and snowfall happening all over the world? DC is under blizzard conditions at the moment. Ironic.

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for December 17, 2009 | Articles for December 18, 2009 | Articles for December 19, 2009

googlec507860f6901db00.html
The NAACP of the Willamette Valley

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Sean Flynn was a photojournalist in Vietnam, taken captive in 1970 in Cambodia and never seen again.

Click here for all of William's articles and letters.