Saturday January 25, 2025
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Apr-14-2011 16:59printcomments

The Dirty Secret of Clean Tech

If you are investing in a company -- green or not -- because of promises, and not a record of earnings, you are doing the same thing.

Solar
Courtesy: towersgreen.com

(OCEANSIDE, Calif.) - If you are thinking about investing in Green energy stocks, don’t.

Not if you need the money for retirement, or college, or anything besides impressing your friends with good intentions.

Because green energy companies are creating a lot more press than profits. And that will get worse before -- if ever -- it gets better.

People in the investment business only have two ways to value a share of stock: We can listen to what the company says. Or watch what it does.

If you choose the former, you probably like all the pretty pictures of windmills and solar panels featured so prominently in so many television commercials.

The truth about wind and solar and alternative energy is that none of them would exist without the full-throated support of a well organized green lobby. And that together, both account for an infinitesimal portion of the energy we create.

No amount of subsidies or green happy talk can change this fact: Energy from solar still costs 22 cents a kilowatt hour. Coal cost 6.

That’s not solid enough ground to build a strong portfolio.

If there is one thing smaller than the energy wind and solar produce, it is the profits these energy sources add to their company’s balance sheets.

Prospects are not profits. Talking is not doing. Betting on prospects is gambling. Betting on performance is investing.

Last year, President Obama visited the solar power manufacturer Solyndra, the largest recipient of federal subsidies for solar power. Despite all the talk about the bright future of solar, not one major news account of that day mentioned one small fact about this company: Just a few months earlier, to prepare for a stock offering, its own accounting firm said the company was no longer a “going concern.” So it had to cancel its Initial Public Offering for stock.

And that was after the hundreds of millions of dollar in federal loans.

The President of the United States was betting the future of green energy on a company whose own accounting firm said would not be in business for long.

If you are investing in a company -- green or not -- because of promises, and not a record of earnings, you are doing the same thing.

Little noted in the green frenzy of the last few years are the companies that drill or pump or mine for oil, natural gas or coal, They are making money.They never stopped - even during the financial tsunami.

What they say is not that sexy. What they do is. CSX makes money running railroads. Caterpillar makes money building trucks. Golar makes money carry liquified natural gas.

And they are doing so despite one of the most challenging regulatory environments any business can imagine.

It is not in the least political to say our leaders in Washington are losing their appetite for -- and ability to -- heap subsidies on expensive energy while ignoring abundant domestic supplies in times of record scarcity.

Already, some big funds are getting out of green energy because investors want something that actually makes money.

So should we.

Bill Gunderson is the owner of Gunderson Capital Management in Oceanside, California. Bill also hosts a show on




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



jane the green girl April 15, 2011 2:52 pm (Pacific time)

yes, paul, perhaps you could recommend some green stocks from your portfolio. and a list of charitable giving is not considered a portfolio.


jim April 15, 2011 1:39 am (Pacific time)

hey paul how much of your money have you invested in green energy?


Anonymous April 14, 2011 7:38 pm (Pacific time)

Actually, man made global warming is not a done deal. There has been much controversy, and even more deception and corruption. In fact, many countries have already dismissed AGW as a hoax. Everyone knows its just a carbon tax for the NWO banks. Come on Paul. Its obvious what they are doing. Anyway, in regards to this article, obama, all the politicians, are bought and paid for, and their money comes from the banks and the oil companies. So they will stop any type of new energy ideas. Wake up Paul, and do some research. Solar is awesome, but it gets little attention or R and D. Obama;s contributors dont want anything but oil, and it shows. And the AGW is nothing but taxes for the world bank. The only ones truly hurting the environment are obama's/bush's/ clintons friends...GE and BP, goldman sachs and JP morgan.. They ruined the pacific ocean, the atlantic ocean, and the world economy. And now they want you to pay taxes to clean up the environment. lo friggin l


Paul Dobbs April 14, 2011 5:34 pm (Pacific time)

Okay of course it's not a good idea to invest your entire nest egg in risky stocks, but Mr. Gunderson's wholesale dismissal of green energy development is absurd. Either he has no children, or lives in a fantasy world. Human-caused global warming is real. Left unchecked, global warming will cause drastic changes our climate and result in a massively chaotic, destructive environment for our children and grandchildren. Yet, Gunderson's only criteria for investment in energy development is short-term financial profit. This is the epitome of sticking you head in the sand. He should wake up, consider the plight of the next generations and become part of the solution.

[Return to Top]
©2025 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for April 13, 2011 | Articles for April 14, 2011 | Articles for April 15, 2011
Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

Support
Salem-News.com:


Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.

googlec507860f6901db00.html