911 Family Victim Wants Answers, Runs Brighton Marathon

Matt Campbell is running the Brighton marathon tomorrow with a high profile T Shirt with the logo "911: Inside Job?" to draw attention to his questions.

(LONDON) - Matt Campbell lost his brother in the 911 attacks and as a family member was briefly feted in New York in the aftermath.

Bur since then doubts have circulated ever more widely about the official 911 story and Matt has some questions he would like the authorities to answer.

So far though he has come up against a brick wall. The UK government has told him that it never examined the 911 official story, taking Washington's account entirely on trust. So Matt wrote to the US Embassador who has so far failed to even acknowledge Matt's letter.

Mat is now running the Brighton marathon tomorrow with a high profile T Shirt with the logo "911: Inside Job?" to draw attention to his questions.

Matt expects to be crossing the finishing line around 1.00pm tomorrow Sunday 6 April.

Here are three of the questions that the US government must answer to satisfy 911 sceptics.

1. How did WTC 7 collapse at free fall speed symmetrically into its own footprint? The official NIST report has no explanation for this, while the owner appears to have let slip that it was a controlled demolition.

2. Why did the CIA take what Richard Clarke, White House anti-terror co-ordinator at the time, calls a "decision" to protect the alleged 911 hijackers from arrest by the FBI in the weeks before the 911 attacks?

3. What was the script for the "anti-hijack exercise" that the Pentagn had running at the exact time as the presumed 911 hijacks, and which they tried to hide from investigators?

Salem-News.com Top Stories

2025: Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst

Two Wars with No Way Out

No One Owns the Future

The Ugly Origins of Trump's America First Policy

A One-State Solution Could Transform the World

Comments Leave a comment on this story.

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.

Albury Smith April 9, 2014 4:12 am (Pacific time)

How about Trade Tower 7? Ask Richard Gage* and his "experts" to show you on video with audio how explosives or incendiaries secretly cut the 4.91" flanges, 3.07" webs, and 215 sq in cross sections of W14 X 730 columns like the 11 of 24 in WTC 7's core, and the 4 corner columns in each tower's core: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c2o8k4n9CY http://www.ochshorndesign.com/cornell/writings/milstein-critique/images/8-fig04.png If they ever HAD TO do it, this "debate" would be OVER. *Gage's ONLY 9/11 "research": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFVi4qbN2jM

Albury Smith April 7, 2014 3:50 pm (Pacific time)

Gish Gallops are always "so just getting started." Why, pray tell, are insurance policies on buildings already hit by Muslim terrorists so suspicious to you? Silverstein's creditors forced him to up the limits on his. Fire-induced collapses are not "implosions." I didn't see the name box the first time I posted to this article. My bad.

Anonymous April 7, 2014 4:19 am (Pacific time)

1. Matt Campbell should ask a qualified SE to explain NCSTAR 1A to him, or at least explain gravity to him.
2. Clarke said no such thing.
3. There were no military exercises on 9/11 that were out of the ordinary, and none that affected the NORAD response time. Exercises are run with unarmed planes, and NORAD had its usual 2 F15s at Otis and 2 F16s at Langley, all of which were armed and on standby. They did not have enough time to reach the first 3 planes, but the Langley fighters might have gotten to UA 93 if it had made it to the DC area.

Any reason an authority figure, which you claim to be, would not use their name? You are the one who needs to go back to school, talk about building implosions, the Larry Silverstein insurance policy for terrorism, the airline put options, the seizure of the cameras that would have shown an airplane striking the Pentagon. How about the third building in NYC, Trade Tower 7? Trust me, I am so just getting started...

Anonymous April 6, 2014 8:41 pm (Pacific time)

Great article and questions. Get the answer to those questions and we will be one step closer to holding war crimes trials for war criminals G.W. Bush and Barack Obama.

CW April 6, 2014 5:48 pm (Pacific time)

THE THREE QUESTIONS: CAN YOU FIX STUPID?

[Return to Top]